All posts by c2me

What Ferran Adria is cooking up after El Bulli

March 28, 2010

Ferran Adria’s scientific approach to cuisine has made El Bulli the top destination for gastronomes worldwide. Now the revolutionary Spanish chef is preparing to turn his restaurant into a culinary think-tank 

By Christine Toomey

Stripped naked to the waist, Ferran Adria leads me to a far corner of his high-tech test kitchen-cum-science lab and, struggling his stocky frame into a white chef’s tunic, gestures towards some items on the wall. “This isn’t what you’d expect to see, is it?” he asks in quick-fire Spanish, challenging me to disagree.

Next to a sketch by the American cartoonist Matt Groening depicting Ferran as a character from The Simpsons is a poster from a German contemporary-art exhibition that Ferran was invited to participate in, to the consternation of critics who argued that cooking is not art. Above this is a letter from Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences inviting Ferran to give a lecture series on cooking and science. Not the usual trophies you’d expect to find in the domain of a master chef — but then Ferran is a revolutionary. Part crazy artist, part mad scientist, he cooks up extravagant dishes such as “frozen chocolate air”, “gold-tinted caramel of quails’ eggs”, “apple caviar” and “foie-gras noodles” frozen with liquid nitrogen.

In January he stunned the culinary world by announcing that in 2012 he will close his restaurant El Bulli, located on a remote Catalonian cove about 100 miles northeast of Barcelona, for two years of reflection, before reopening it in a new format. “There are certain moments in life when it comes time to stop and reflect, recharge the batteries, come up with a new direction,” says Ferran. “I don’t know why anyone should be surprised at this. It takes a lot more these days, in every walk of life, not just cooking, to be fresh and creative. The world is much more complex now.”

The decision appeared quixotic. El Bulli fields more than 2m requests a year for 8,000 sittings. Would-be diners bombard the restaurant with emails within minutes of the year’s booking list being opened. It takes eight staff weeks to answer all these messages, and tables are allotted by a form of lottery. The restaurant is already fully booked from the day it opens on June 15 to the end of this year.

Spanish comedy shows often depict Ferran as a balding madman conjuring up dishes out of pieces of string or old shoes. But he has earned a grudging respect for his adventurous culinary creations. One Barcelonan tells me: “Before Ferran we had potatoes, tortilla and paella. He has made us think about food.”

Among hardened gastronomes he has a godlike status. “Ferran is the Picasso of the modern kitchen,” enthuses Rafael Anson, president of the International Academy of Gastronomy. “Just as Picasso revolutionised art with cubism, Ferran has changed the history of cooking. He has changed all the rules — just like challenging the social norm that says you should have sex at night with the lights off. He has brought an incredible creativity and liberty to the kitchen.”

Little wonder then that the culinary world whipped itself into a great soufflé of speculation about what the master chef is really planning. El Bulli has never been a commercial restaurant in the strictest sense. For a start it’s only open for six months a year — this year, from June to December — and even then it only serves supper. This is a degustation menu of around 40 small dishes, often accompanied with instructions on how they should be savoured, such as: “This is a childhood memory. Take in one bite.”

Ferran dedicates the rest of the year to cooking up dozens of new trompe l’oeil creations in the inner sanctum of his culinary empire — his taller, or workshop. This is where I have come to meet him. The master chef leads me into a small chapel in an 18th-century villa on a narrow street off Barcelona’s Ramblas — now part of the duplex that houses his workshop.

The method Ferran employs to concoct his dishes has been dubbed “molecular gastronomy”, though it’s a term he hates. “What does that mean?” he bridles. “Can you explain it to me?” He prefers his style to be called “deconstructivist”, by which he means breaking a basic food item down to understand why it has the texture and flavour it does and then reconstructing it in a way that challenges preconceptions about how something should look and taste.

The New York Times once called the 47-year-old Catalan “the Elvis of the culinary world” and El Bulli “its Graceland”. If that’s the case then Ferran’s taller is its chief recording studio — although some of the machinery and surgical-looking implements on display make it look more like a DIY shed or DNA lab. Laid out in one rack is a selection of giant plastic syringes. Alongside this is a Bosch screwdriver that, according to a small note attached, is used for making sweets. In another cabinet are rows and rows of spoons of every shape and size, some with tiny holes in them, marked variously for “writing” or “straining”, and pincers that look more like gynaecological tools.

With such instruments he has concocted extraordinary tastes and technical results never before achieved in the kitchen. One of his earliest trademarks, for instance, was to use a type of soda siphon to compress food, extract flavour and make “foams” with everything from broccoli to blueberries.

He decided to temporarily close the restaurant, Ferran explains, when he realised both he and El Bulli will be 50 years old in 2012. His intention is not to spend the two-year hiatus “sitting on a beach”. He plans to travel the world looking for ideas and new inspiration, he says, throwing his arms in the air and slumping into a leather chair at the head of a dining table that runs the length of the chapel.

Ferran’s utterances can sound pompous, but his manner is not. He is intense and obsessive, like most creative talents. In a filing cabinet he has drawers of dog-eared notebooks in which he jots down ideas. He has the air of a genuine free thinker, and speaks rapidly as if his thoughts are running away with him. He urgently wants to be understood, leaning forward in his chair and fixing me with a stare to emphasise a point. But he is not overbearing. His young chefs defer to him like students to a professor: he is not a tyrant.

“Perhaps it’s my fault I am misunderstood,” he continues. “You need to understand the entire history of El Bulli to appreciate what we do and what direction I might take in future.”

The restaurant had an inauspicious start. Originally it was little more than a beach cafe attached to a mini-golf attraction built by a German homeopathic doctor. Called Hacienda El Bulli after its owners’ pet bulldogs, for years it was simply known as “the German bar” by scuba-diving customers who pitched up on the secluded Cala Montjoi bay near the small town of Roses where it sits. It took more than 20 years for the place to evolve into a stylish restaurant serving nouvelle cuisine that, by the time Ferran arrived there as a young cook in 1984, had already been awarded a Michelin star.

On his own admission Ferran only fell into cooking by chance. The son of a Barcelona house painter, his first stint in the kitchen, washing dishes, was a means of paying his way to Ibiza where he wanted to party and meet girls. Later, during his military service, he worked in army kitchens serving basic meals to conscripts before taking a position as a young chef to an admiral in the port town of Cartagena, where he was once called on to cook a meal for the king of Spain. The die was cast.

After his military service he took an internship at El Bulli, where he was soon made chef de cuisine by the then manager Juli Soler, now a partner in the restaurant. While Ferran began by cooking classic French recipes, he and his younger brother Albert, also a chef, soon started experimenting with traditional dishes, pulling them apart and turning them into something entirely new.

He was inspired to move into the unknown by the French chef Jacques Maximin’s comment that “creativity is not copying”. “From that moment on, everything changed,” says Ferran.

“I understood something I had never understood before. I passed from being a technician to a creator.” He insists that the ethos of his restaurant is “to be an icon of creativity”. Such statements provide rich fodder to those who criticise him for being pretentious. One food writer once described his style of cooking as “Harry Potter food” — designed to show off to other chefs.

Joe Warwick, the former editor of Restaurant magazine, which has given El Bulli first place in its world’s top 50 restaurants awards for the past four years, likens Ferran’s influence on everyday cooking to that of haute couture on prêt-à-porter. “People may think his sort of cooking is bollocks, pretentious and elitist, but it’s like the latest collection from a great fashion designer; you’re not meant to wear it walking down the high street. Influences from it trickle down.”

“When El Bulli reopens in 2014, it won’t be in the guidebooks,” Ferran declares. It will therefore lose its coveted three Michelin stars and its top ranking among the world’s best restaurants, but he professes not to care. “I’m tired of awards and rankings. My plan is that El Bulli will have a much more flexible format.”

There was a frenzy of speculation that El Bulli would be closing for good at the end of 2011 owing to annual losses of over half a million euros, but Ferran issued a denial; the fact that the restaurant runs at a loss and is supported by having its name stamped on lucrative spin-offs has been well known for years.

“It’s not true that we are closing El Bulli permanently. We will continue to serve meals in 2014,” the chef insisted. What he plans is for El Bulli to operate as a “gastronomic think-tank”, a private nonprofit foundation for “avant-garde gastronomy lovers, chefs, sommeliers and front-of-house professionals”.

He intends to offer annual scholarships for 20 to 25 young people from all over the world to come and learn, not just about cooking, but also design and other artistic pursuits. A rough model for this is the so-called “applied creativity laboratory” known as Fabrica set up by the Benetton clothing giant in Treviso, Italy. It is a research centre that encourages young talent across a wide spectrum of design. “In future El Bulli will be a breeding ground for new ideas and new talents, a place where we will teach people to think,” he adds grandly.

In the long term there are also plans for an “exhaustive and detailed” encyclopedia of contemporary cuisine. Ferran insists that food will still be served to a select circle of diners. “Maybe one week we will do just breakfasts. The next, we might be closed. The following, we might serve just one extraordinary supper.” From 2014 bookings might be sold at auction with the proceeds going to charity.

Despite its popularity, El Bulli runs at a loss not only because it is so rarely open, but because Ferran’s exacting standards mean it can sometimes have more trained chefs in the kitchen than the 50 diners it accommodates of an evening. Also, the cost of its menu — around ¤250 a head without wine — while not cheap, is less than some other restaurants lower down in the world ranking.

With such demand for his food, Ferran points out he could charge a great deal more. Or, as many have suggested, open 10 El Bullis around the world. But he has refused, he says, on ethical grounds. “It has nothing to do with being elitist. If I could open 50 El Bullis, I would. It’s frustrating being so exclusive. But it’s all about quality. For me, being ethical is the most important thing. People have a right to expect me in the kitchen and I can only be in one place at a time.”

Unlike most high-end restaurants that change their menus seasonally with a limited number of dishes, Ferran and his team come up with hundreds of new recipes each year. Much of what is done is about spectacle, Ferran admits, likening eating at El Bulli to “a night out at the theatre”.

Will this taste for drama mean El Bulli will incorporate some kind of performance art when it reopens in 2014? “I believe in future Ferran will fundamentally challenge our idea of what a gastronomic space is all about,” ventures Rafael Anson, a fellow Spaniard. “It need no longer be just a place where you are served a series of dishes, but could incorporate a series of spectacles, a kind of culinary Cirque du Soleil.”

What drives Ferran is not money but ideas, he claims. “I am not a materialistic person.” His lifestyle bears this out. He does not own a car and lives in a modest apartment in the centre of Barcelona with his wife during the months he dedicates to researching dishes at his workshop. “I’m not interested in owning expensive watches or sports cars. If I need to get somewhere I take a taxi. I’ll travel thousands of miles for good food. But apart from that, my life is simple,” he says. “All that remains is for me to be happy.”

No doubt the income he enjoys from the many spin-offs from El Bulli helps bolster a sense of contentment. First there are the lectures and consultancies, including one with the Spanish hotel chain NH Hotels. Then there are the books — one, A Day at elBulli, runs to over 600 pages — and a range of kitchenware designed to set off the sort of dishes he conjures up, and his name on a range of brands from olive oil to cutlery.

Ferran has faced accusations that his style of cooking is bad for the health, from the Spanish chef Santi Santamaria and the German author Jörg Zipprick, who said that meals at El Bulli should carry health warnings. “These colourants, gelling agents, emulsifiers, acidifiers and taste enhancers that Adria has introduced massively into his dishes to obtain extraordinary textures, tastes and sensations do not have a neutral impact on health,” wrote Zipprick, who singled out the use of seaweed-derived polysaccharides as being linked to intestinal cancer.

But as the British food writer Paul Levy, who co-chairs the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery, points out: “Who eats such food every day? Have you ever met anyone who ingests enough of it for the effects to be measurable?” What Ferran is doing has more in common with the entertainment ancient Romans sought from their food than with the more recent strictures of French cuisine, argues Levy. “Wonderful though Ferran is, a meal at El Bulli is never lunch or dinner, but an entertainment, a new kind of experience, a hybrid of eating out and a demonstration at the Royal Society.”

Speculation is rife as to where the culinary trophies will pass once El Bulli is out of the running. In the short term other shrines of “molecular gastronomy” including Heston Blumenthal’s Fat Duck in Berkshire, Rene Redzepi’s Noma in Copenhagen and Thomas Keller’s French Laundry in California are leading contenders. In the long term, few doubt the most exciting cuisine of the future is likely to come from the Far East. Following the Michelin guide’s recent move to rate restaurants in Japan, Tokyo already boasts more three-star restaurants than Paris.

Ferran agrees that Japan and China are the countries to watch. But, he says, “The best restaurant in the world does not exist. It’s stupid to talk of El Bulli as the best. It’s not something you can measure. It’s not like winning a 100-metre race. You can only talk about the most creative, the most influential.” In this respect Ferran has certainly hogged the spotlight in recent years.

So, after discussing the merits of the most creative food in the world with him, I am looking forward to tasting some of his latest creations.

All the time we have been speaking I have caught glimpses of handsome young chefs emerging from the hub of his laboratory, one wall of which looks more like an art gallery than a kitchen. Along its length are hundreds of specimen jars containing samples of everything from “coal oil” to “lemon peel”. Set apart from these, in a bank of glass, is a small pot of salt. “That’s to remind us that salt is the most important ingredient in the world. The only one that can entirely change a dish,” declares Ferran. When I ask what dishes are being prepared that day, however, he looks frustrated, as if faced with a slow learner. “This is where we work on concepts, not finished dishes,” he explains, wafting his nose over a tiny skillet where three slivers of what appear to be mushrooms are being stirred with a look of intense concentration by one of his assistants.

Hunched over a hob close by, another assistant swizzles small sections of mushy artichoke in an equally minute pan as if the kitchen belongs to hobbits. He explains he’s investigating whether the mush can be used to replace traditional flour and water to make pasta shapes. None of it looks very appetising. Catching sight of me looking crestfallen, Ferran decides to indulge me. He holds the slimmest of wafers towards my lips, as if offering me a communion host. The wafer is made of potato starch, he explains, and comes from Japan, where pharmacists use them as paper twists in which to dispense herbal concoctions. Perched on top of the wafer are a few globules of juice from what I am told is an Australian finger-lime. As I slip the wafer into my mouth I am expecting a moment of revelation, an almost religious, out-of-body experience. I close my eyes and wait for an extraordinary burst of flavour that will change my entire perspective on food. What I feel is a glutinous goo slither across my tongue leaving a slight citrus edge. Nothing else.

When I open my eyes, disappointed, Ferran laughs, claps his hands and announces it’s time for him to go. “Call me in July and I’ll see if I can fit you in at El Bulli,” he tantalises. With that he’s gone. All that’s left is for the photographer and me to pop around the corner for a ham sandwich.

Bowing Out At The Top

THE AUSTRALIAN MAGAZINE

April 24, 2010

Ferran Adria will give up three Michelin stars when he closes El Bulli for a two-year sabbatical. But its reincarnation will be worth it, he tells Christine Toomey

STRIPPED NAKED TO THE WAIST, FERRAN Adria leads me to a far corner of his high-tech test-kitchen-cum-science-lab and, struggling his stocky frame into a white chef’s tunic, gestures towards some items on the wall. “This isn’t what you’d expect to see, is it?” he asks in quick-fire Spanish, challenging me to disagree.

Next to a sketch by the American cartoonist Matt Groening, depicting Adria as a character from The Simpsons, is a poster from a German contemporary-art exhibition that Adria was invited to participate in, to the consternation of critics who argued that cooking is not art. Above this is a letter from Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences inviting Adria to give a lecture series on cooking and science. Not the usual trophies you’d expect to find in the domain of a master chef – but then Adria is a revolutionary. Part crazy artist, part mad scientist, he cooks up extravagant dishes such as “frozen chocolate air”, “gold-tinted caramel of quails’ eggs”, “apple caviar” and “foie-gras noodles” frozen with liquid nitrogen.

In January he stunned the culinary world by announcing that in 2012 he will close his restaurant El Bulli, located on a remote Catalonian cove about 100 miles northeast of Barcelona, for two years of reflection, before reopening it in a new format. “There are certain moments in life when it comes time to stop and reflect, recharge the batteries, come up with a new direction,” says Adria. “I don’t know why anyone should be surprised at this. It takes a lot more these days, in every walk of life, not just cooking, to be fresh and creative. The world is much more complex now.”

The decision appeared quixotic. El Bulli fields more than two million requests a year for 8000 sittings. Would-be diners bombard the restaurant with emails within minutes of the year’s booking list being opened. It takes eight staff weeks to answer all these messages, and tables are allotted by a form of lottery. The restaurant is already fully booked from the day it opens on June 15 to the end of this year.

Spanish comedy shows often depict Adria as a balding madman conjuring up dishes out of pieces of string or old shoes. But he has earned a grudging respect for his adventurous culinary creations. One Barcelonan tells me: “Before Ferran we had potatoes, tortilla and paella. He has made us think about food.”

Among hardened gastronomes he has a godlike status. “Ferran is the Picasso of the modern kitchen,” enthuses Rafael Anson, president of the International Academy of Gastronomy. “Just as Picasso revolutionised art with cubism, Ferran has changed the history of cooking. He has changed all the rules – just like challenging the social norm that says you should have sex at night with the lights off. He has brought an incredible creativity and liberty to the kitchen.”

Little wonder, then, that the culinary world whipped itself into a great souffle of speculation about what the master chef is really planning. El Bulli has never been a commercial restaurant in the strictest sense. For a start, it’s only open for six months a year – this year, from June to December – and even then it only serves supper. This is a degustation menu of around 40 small dishes, often accompanied with instructions on how they should be savoured, such as: “This is a childhood memory. Take in one bite.”

Adria dedicates the rest of the year to cooking up dozens of new creations in the inner sanctum of his culinary empire – his taller, or workshop. This is where I have come to meet him. The master chef leads me into a small chapel in an 18th-century villa on a narrow street off Barcelona’s Ramblas – now part of the duplex that houses his workshop.

The method Adria employs to concoct his dishes has been dubbed “molecular gastronomy” – a term he hates. “What does that mean?” he bridles. “Can you explain it to me?” He prefers his style to be called “deconstructivist”, by which he means breaking a basic food item down to understand why it has the texture and flavour it does, and then reconstructing it in a way that challenges preconceptions about how something should look and taste.

Tools of the trade

THE NEW YORK TIMES ONCE CALLED THE 47-year-old Catalan “the Elvis of the culinary world” and El Bulli “its Graceland”. If that’s the case, then Adria’s taller is its chief recording studio – although some of the machinery and surgical-looking implements on display make it look more like a DIY shed or DNA lab. Laid out in one rack is a selection of giant plastic syringes. Alongside this is a Bosch screwdriver that, according to a small note attached, is used for making sweets. In another cabinet are rows and rows of spoons of every shape and size, some with tiny holes in them, marked variously for “writing” or “straining”, and pincers that look more like gynaecological tools.

With such instruments he has concocted extraordinary tastes and technical results never before achieved in the kitchen. One of his earliest trademarks, for instance, was to use a type of soda siphon to compress food, extract flavour and make “foams” with everything from broccoli to blueberries.

Adria decided to temporarily close the restaurant, he explains, when he realised both he and El Bulli will be 50 years old in 2012. His intention is not to spend the two-year hiatus “sitting on a beach”. He plans to travel the world looking for ideas and new inspiration, he says, throwing his arms in the air and slumping into a leather chair at the head of a dining table that runs the length of the chapel.

Adria’s utterances can sound pompous, but his manner is not. He is intense and obsessive, like most creative talents. In a filing cabinet he has drawers of dog-eared notebooks in which he jots down ideas. He has the air of a genuine free thinker, and speaks rapidly as if his thoughts are running away with him. He urgently wants to be understood, leaning forward in his chair and fixing me with a stare to emphasise a point. But he is not overbearing. His young chefs defer to him like students to a professor: he is not a tyrant.

“Perhaps it’s my fault I am misunderstood,” he continues. “You need to understand the entire history of El Bulli to appreciate what we do and what direction I might take in future.”

The restaurant had an inauspicious start. Originally it was little more than a beach cafe attached to a mini-golf attraction built by a German homeopathic doctor. Called Hacienda El Bulli after its owners’ pet bulldogs, for years it was simply known as “the German bar” by scuba-diving customers who pitched up on the secluded Cala Montjoi bay near the small town of Roses where it sits. It took more than 20 years for the place to evolve into a stylish restaurant serving nouvelle cuisine that, by the time Adria arrived there as a young cook in 1984, had already been awarded a Michelin star.

On his own admission, Adria fell into cooking by chance. The son of a Barcelona house painter, his first stint in the kitchen, washing dishes, was a means of paying his way to Ibiza where he wanted to party and meet girls. Later, during his military service, he worked in army kitchens serving basic meals to conscripts before taking a position as a young chef to an admiral in the port town of Cartagena, where he was once called on to cook a meal for the king of Spain. The die was cast.

After his military service he took an internship at El Bulli, where he was soon made chef de cuisine by the then manager Juli Soler, now a partner in the restaurant. While Adria began by cooking classic French recipes, he and his younger brother Albert, also a chef, soon started experimenting with traditional dishes, pulling them apart and turning them into something entirely new.

He was inspired to move into the unknown by the French chef Jacques Maximin’s comment that “creativity is not copying”. “From that moment on, everything changed,” says Adria.

“I understood something I had never understood before. I passed from being a technician to a creator.” He insists that the ethos of his restaurant is “to be an icon of creativity”. Such statements provide rich fodder to those who criticise him for being pretentious. One food writer once described his style of cooking as “Harry Potter food” – designed to show off to other chefs.

Joe Warwick, the former editor of Restaurant magazine, which has given El Bulli first place in its world’s top 50 restaurants awards for the past four years, likens Adria’s influence on everyday cooking to that of haute couture on pret-a-porter. He says: “People may think his sort of cooking is bollocks, pretentious and elitist, but it’s like the latest collection from a great fashion designer – you’re not meant to wear it walking down the high street. Influences from it trickle down.”

“When El Bulli reopens in 2014, it won’t be in the guidebooks,” Adria declares. It will therefore lose its coveted three Michelin stars and its top ranking among the world’s best restaurants, but he professes not to care. “I’m tired of awards and rankings. My plan is that El Bulli will have a much more flexible format.”

There was a frenzy of speculation that El Bulli would be closing for good at the end of 2011 owing to annual losses of more than half a million euros ($733,000), but Adria issued a denial; the fact that the restaurant runs at a loss and is supported by having its name stamped on lucrative spin-offs has been well known for years.

“It’s not true that we are closing El Bulli permanently. We will continue to serve meals in 2014,” the chef insisted. What he plans is for El Bulli to operate as a “gastronomic think-tank”, a private, non-profit foundation for “avant-garde gastronomy lovers, chefs, sommeliers and front-of-house professionals”.

He intends to offer annual scholarships for 20 to 25 young people from all over the world to come and learn, not just about cooking, but also design and other artistic pursuits. A rough model for this is the so-called “applied creativity laboratory” known as Fabrica set up by the Benetton clothing giant in Italy. It is a research centre that encourages young talent across a wide spectrum of design. “In future El Bulli will be a breeding ground for new ideas and new talents, a place where we will teach people to think,” he says. In the long term there are also plans for an “exhaustive and detailed” encyclopedia of contemporary cuisine. Adria insists that food will still be served to a select circle of diners. “Maybe one week we will do just breakfasts. The next, we might be closed. The following, we might serve just one extraordinary supper.” From 2014 bookings might be sold at auction, with the proceeds going to charity.

Despite its popularity, El Bulli runs at a loss not only because it is so rarely open, but because Adria’s exacting standards mean it can sometimes have more chefs in the kitchen than the 50 diners it accommodates of an evening. Also, the cost – around (Euro) 250 ($366) a head without wine – while not cheap, is less than some other restaurants lower down in the world ranking.

With such demand for his food, Adria points out he could charge a great deal more. Or, as many have suggested, open 10 El Bullis around the world. But he has refused, he says, on ethical grounds. “It has nothing to do with being elitist. If I could open 50 El Bullis, I would. It’s frustrating being so exclusive. But it’s all about quality. For me, being ethical is the most important thing. People have a right to expect me in the kitchen and I can only be in one place at a time.”

Unlike most high-end restaurants that change their menus seasonally with a limited number of dishes, Adria and his team come up with hundreds of new recipes each year. Much of what is done is about spectacle, he admits, likening eating at El Bulli to “a night out at the theatre”.

Will this taste for drama mean El Bulli will incorporate some kind of performance art when it reopens in 2014? “I believe in future Ferran will fundamentally challenge our idea of what a gastronomic space is all about,” ventures Rafael Anson, a fellow Spaniard. “It need no longer be just a place where you are served a series of dishes, but could incorporate a series of spectacles, a kind of culinary Cirque du Soleil.”

The simple life

WHAT DRIVES ADRIA IS NOT MONEY BUT IDEAS. “I am not a materialistic person,” he says. His lifestyle bears this out. He does not own a car and lives in a modest apartment in the centre of Barcelona with his wife during the months he dedicates to researching dishes at his workshop. “I’m not interested in owning expensive watches or sports cars. If I need to get somewhere I take a taxi. I’ll travel thousands of miles for good food. But apart from that, my life is simple,” he says. “All that remains is for me to be happy.”

No doubt the income he enjoys from the many spin-offs from El Bulli helps bolster a sense of contentment. First there are the lectures and consultancies, including one with the Spanish hotel chain NH Hotels. Then there are the books and a range of kitchenware designed to set off the sort of dishes he conjures up, and his name on a range of brands from olive oil to cutlery.

Adria has faced accusations that his style of cooking is bad for one’s health, from the Spanish chef Santi Santamaria and the German author Jorg Zipprick, who said that meals at El Bulli should carry health warnings. “These colourants, gelling agents, emulsifiers, acidifiers and taste enhancers that Adria has introduced massively into his dishes to obtain extraordinary textures, tastes and sensations do not have a neutral impact on health,” wrote Zipprick, who singled out the use of seaweed-derived polysaccharides as being linked to intestinal cancer.

But as the British food writer Paul Levy, who co-chairs the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery, points out: “Who eats such food every day? Have you ever met anyone who ingests enough of it for the effects to be measurable?” What Adria is doing has more in common with the entertainment ancient Romans sought from their food than with the more recent strictures of French cuisine, argues Levy. “Wonderful though Ferran is, a meal at El Bulli is never lunch or dinner, but an entertainment, a new kind of experience, a hybrid of eating out and a demonstration at the Royal Society.”

Speculation is rife as to where the culinary trophies will pass once El Bulli is out of the running. In the short term other shrines of “molecular gastronomy” including Heston Blumenthal’s Fat Duck in England, Rene Redzepi’s Noma in Denmark and Thomas Keller’s French Laundry in the US are leading contenders. In the long term, few doubt that the most exciting cuisine of the future is likely to come from the Far East. Following the Michelin guide’s recent move to rate restaurants in Japan, Tokyo already boasts more three-star restaurants than Paris.

Adria agrees that Japan and China are the countries to watch. But, he says, “The best restaurant in the world does not exist. It’s stupid to talk of El Bulli as the best. It’s not something you can measure. It’s not like winning a 100-metre race. You can only talk about the most creative, the most influential.” In this respect Adria has certainly hogged the spotlight in recent years.

All the time we have been speaking, I have caught glimpses of handsome young chefs emerging from the hub of Adria’s laboratory, one wall of which looks more like an art gallery than a kitchen. Along its length are hundreds of specimen jars containing samples of everything from “coal oil” to “lemon peel”. Set apart from these, in a bank of glass, is a small pot of salt. “That’s to remind us that salt is the most important ingredient in the world. The only one that can entirely change a dish,” declares Adria. When I ask what dishes are being prepared that day, however, he looks frustrated, as if faced with a slow learner. “This is where we work on concepts, not finished dishes,” he explains, wafting his nose over a tiny skillet where three slivers of what appear to be mushrooms are being stirred with a look of intense concentration by one of his assistants.

Hunched over a hob close by, another assistant swizzles small sections of mushy artichoke in an equally minute pan, as if the kitchen belongs to hobbits. He explains he’s investigating whether the mush can be used to replace traditional flour and water to make pasta shapes. None of it looks very appetising. Catching sight of me looking crestfallen, Adria decides to indulge me. He holds the slimmest of wafers towards my lips, as if offering me a communion host. The wafer is made of potato starch, he explains, and comes from Japan, where pharmacists use them as paper twists in which to dispense herbal concoctions. Perched on top of the wafer are a few globules of juice from what I am told is an Australian finger lime. As I slip the wafer into my mouth I am expecting a moment of revelation, an almost religious, out-of-body experience. I close my eyes and wait for an extraordinary burst of flavour that will change my entire perspective on food. What I feel is a glutinous goo slither across my tongue, leaving a slight citrus edge. Nothing else.

When I open my eyes, disappointed, Adria laughs, claps his hands and announces it’s time for him to go. “Call me in July and I’ll see if I can fit you in at El Bulli,” he tantalises. With that he’s gone. All that’s left is for the photographer and me to pop around the corner for a ham sandwich.

Copyright 2010 News Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Attualità

October, 2006
Investigation
 

Una giornalista occidentale va a vivere in cisgiordania nella casa di un leader di hamas e delle sue due mogli. e si trova in mezzo a due guerre di sopravvivenza: una politica, l’altra poligama

di Christine Toomey

Foto di Heidi Levine

All’inizio le due mogli erano sospettose. Il marito, Waelal-Husseini, aveva lanciato una monetina al figlio maggiore chiedendogli a mo’ di scherzo di andare a comprare un materasso in più. Sentivo che, a differenza del loro marito, le donne non trovavano quel gesto divertente. Così suggellammo un patto straordinario: sarei tornata per vivere con la loro famiglia; sarei stata la terza donna della casa per raccontare la storia delle due mogli di un parlamentare di Hamas. Donne che, come loro, hanno votato in massa per portare il partito al potere, con una vittoria elettorale che ha rappresentato uno schiaffo a Israele.  È attraverso mogli e madri come loro che si può comprendere come un movimento islamico considerato a livello internazionale un’organizzazione terroristica sia potuto andare al governo. Che delle donne religiose a lungo sottovalutate come “tende silenziose che camminano” abbiano finalmente mostrato la loro influenza elettorale viene spiegato con la corruzione e l’incompetenza di Fatah e il diffuso senso di frustrazione provato nei confronti di questa fazione, un tempo capeggiata da Arafat, che ha dominato la politica palestinese per 40 anni. Ma c’è dell’altro: in molti ritenevano che il processo di pace fosse  ormai morto e, come osservato da un analista, “quando si perdono le speranze nella realtà, ci si rivolge a Dio”.  La prima volta che incontrai la famiglia al-Husseini non avrei potuto immaginare che vivendo con loro avrei presto scoperto il motivo per cui così tante donne, nelle parole dell’analista, erano diventate “fanatiche di Hamas”. All’epoca, Hamas rispettava un periodo di tregua: era dall’estate precedente che non mandava kamikaze in Israele e tentava di crearsi un’immagine che meglio si addicesse alla politica tradizionale.  Le immagini di Huda Ghalia, una bambina di dieci anni che con la testa tra le mani in segno di disperazione si aggira tra i corpi senza vita dei suoi familiari, uccisi da bombe israeliane durante un picnic su una spiaggia di Gaza, non avevano ancora raggiunto le tv di tutto il mondo. Israele continua a negare ogni responsabilità in proposito, ma il giorno successivo Hamas dichiarò la fine del cessate-il-fuoco e – con il rapimento del caporale israeliano Gilad Shalit – mise in moto gli eventi che con i bombardamenti del Libano hanno poi fatto precipitare il Medio Oriente nella guerra. Quando arrivai alla casa di al-Husseini per vivere con la famiglia erano passate solo poche ore dal rapimento, e la regione non era ancora piombata nel violento vortice che è seguito. Wael doveva recarsi in Libano a una conferenza. Che all’avvicinarsi dell’occhio del ciclone un rappresentante di Hamas decidesse di recarsi all’estero mi sembrava sospetto. Eppure, quando arrivai nella casa di Ar-Ram, vicino a Ramallah, in Cisgiordania, c’erano pochi segni di tensione. A tavola, davanti a una colazione a base di hummus, falafel e pane, tutti erano rilassati, anche se Israele era sul punto di entrare con i carriarmati a Gaza. Subito mi spiegarono l’organizzazione familiare. Gli al-Husseini occupano una casa in cemento a due piani accanto alla scuola islamica (madrassa) frequentata da 600 studenti di cui Wael è preside. La sua seconda moglie, sposata due anni fa, si chiama Khulud, ha 35 anni e abita al piano superiore con il figlio di 6 mesi, Hamzeh. Al piano terra vive Alia – sposata a Wael da 20 anni, che ha 10 mesi meno di Khulud – con i sei figli: tre femmine (Ni’mah 17 anni, Arwa 16, Bara’a 6), e tre maschi (Khaled 15 anni, Seif 12, Omar 10). Nell’Islam se un uomo prende più di una moglie – può averne fino a quattro – deve offrire a ciascuna lo stesso sostegno materiale e le medesime attenzioni. Wael, che ha 43 anni, trascorre una notte con Khulud al piano superiore e la successiva di sotto con Alia. “Sono entrambe felici”, dice con un bagliore nello sguardo. In realtà c’è un ben più complesso interagire di emozioni che lentamente emergono quando svaniscono i sospetti di Alia e Khulud riguardo al fatto che il marito mi accogliesse in casa. All’inizio, come sempre in una società così maschilista, solo Wael parla; racconta che i suoi fratelli lo convinsero a studiare ingegneria in Arabia Saudita anziché medicina in Romania “dove avrei potuto essere tentato dalle belle donne”. Nato a Betlemme, secondo in una famiglia di cinque maschi e sei femmine, a Riad nei primi anni ’80 Wael inizia a interessarsi alla Fratellanza Musulmana, il movimento da cui sarebbe poi derivato Hamas. Al suo ritorno in Cisgiordania ha aperto una madrassa, e ha preso parte a iniziative della comunità come “piantare alberi e spazzare le strade” organizzate da Hamas. Allora era un movimento di resistenza islamica che secondo un’opinione diffusa godeva del tacito supporto di Israele, desiderosa di contrastare i gruppi popolari e nazionalistici che facevano capo all’Organizzazione per la Liberazione della Palestina (Olp), ma non appena iniziò a minacciare la sicurezza di Israele con la resistenza violenta iniziarono gli arresti. Wael stesso tra il 1988 e il 2005 venne arrestato otto volte e tenuto per oltre due anni in uno stato di “detenzione amministrativa, reclusione in assenza di incriminazione. E nel 1992, fu uno degli oltre 400 palestinesi vicini ad Hamas deportati dagli israeliani per un anno in un campo di tende in Libano. I soldati israeliani che li sorvegliavano, racconta, spruzzavano sui prigionieri con le gambe incatenate ai sedili di un bus, il contenuto delle buste di plastica nelle quali urinavano.  Mentre tutti ascoltano, Khulud mi confida: “È la prima volta che sento queste storie. Resta con noi quanto vuoi, e continua a fare domande. Abu Khaled non è mai stato presente alla nascita dei suoi figli: era sempre in prigione”, prosegue, usando il termine abu, “padre di”, a differenza di Khulud si riferisce al marito con il suo primo nome. Si percepisce una strisciante rivalità tra le due donne. Non sanno che al mattino, mentre mi trovavo nel suo ufficio, Wael mi ha parlato apertamente di come cavalchi la loro gelosia. “Mi tiene vivo e mi permette di mantenere il controllo”, mi ha confidato con un sorriso. E, felice di essere l’oggetto dell’adorazione e degli sforzi che la prima moglie fa per conquistarsi la sua attenzione, insiste: “Le donne che non permettono al marito di prendere la seconda moglie sono egoiste”. Ma quando gli dico che il suo senso dell’umorismo non si addice all’immagine che all’estero si ha del fanatismo di Hamas, cambia tono: “Lo stereotipo di un politico di Hamas è quello di un terrorista: aggressivo, incivile e bugiardo. Sì, esistono estremisti nel nostro movimento, come ce ne sono in Occidente. Personalmente odio i kamikaze, sono un errore. Odio che dei civili innocenti muoiano in azioni simili e credo che ci spetti una punizione divina per questo. In proposito l’Islam è chiaro: non si devono uccidere i civili. Ma sono atti disperati, compiuti da persone che non vedono alternative. Ogni nostro attacco contro Israele è denunciato come terrorismo mentre i loro attacchi, in cui muoiono donne e bambini innocenti, sono giusitificati come legittime azioni militari”. Negli ultimi dieci anni Hamas ha lanciato contro Israele oltre 40 attacchi suicidi. Eppure, Wael dichiara di non conoscere l’ala militare del movimento. La mattina dopo, però, mentre lo accompagno fino a Gerico, mi rivela che suo fratello maggiore, ucciso due anni fa in Giordania, era a capo di una cellula militare di Hamas. Un altro fratello che viaggia con noi ammette che gli israeliani gli abbiano detto più volte che “considerano Wael più pericoloso del nostro fratello maggiore, perché è un intellettuale, è molto rispettato e ha una grande influenza”. Non sorprende allora che raggiunto il confine Wael venga lasciato ad aspettare per ore prima di essere respinto dai soldati israeliani e debba tornarsene a casa. Quando la mattina dopo rivedo la famiglia, gli occhi infossati di Alia e Khulud e i volti pallidi dei figli testimoniano il dramma che ha avuto luogo nella notte. Dopo mezzanotte, decine di soldati hanno circondato la casa, hanno buttato giù a calci la porta del retro e costretto con le armi Wael a salire su una jeep. Solo Khulud ha assistito a tutto: era il suo turno per stare con il marito. Quella notte in tutta la Cisgiordania erano state portate a termine decine di azioni analoghe, in un attacco a sorpresa contro Hamas. Un terzo del gabinetto palestinese – 8 ministri, compreso il vice primo ministro – 20 membri del Parlamento e 40 leader cittadini sono stati prelevati dalle loro case e rinchiusi in un carcere vicino a Ramallah. Nel frattempo gli israeliani bombardavano la Striscia di Gaza. Nelle due settimane seguenti oltre 60 palestinesi – tra cui molte donne e bambini – sono morti sotto i bombardamenti, e un soldato israeliano è rimasto vittima del fuoco amico. Temevo che, data la situazione, la famiglia non volesse più un’estranea in casa. Ma le donne sembravano credere che la mia presenza potesse proteggerle da ulteriori rappresaglie, e non solo mi rinnovarono l’invito a restare, ma nei giorni che seguirono – e in assenza del marito – iniziarono a confidarsi con me. La prima è stata Alia: “Abu Khaled si è risposato mentre mi trovavo in ospedale a Nablus”, racconta. “Mi ero bruciata con dell’acqua, avevo ustioni di terzo grado e mi hanno fatto un trapianto di pelle. Non sapevo nulla, e quando sono tornata a casa e ho scoperto che aveva preso una seconda moglie sono rimasta profondamente turbata. È stato molto difficile”. Quando Alia ha provato ad andarsene e tornare dai suoi genitori, la famiglia del marito – in particolare la suocera – glielo ha impedito. Il motivo per cui Wael ha preso una seconda moglie, le ha spiegato lui è “così lei ti può aiutare nelle faccende domestiche”. Alia però ha scoperto che Wael aveva affittato un appartamento dove intendeva vivere parte del tempo con Khulud. “L’ho supplicato di restare con me”, dice, “e la prima volta che mi portò Khulud per presentarmela non ho pianto. A un tratto mi sono sentita molto serena e sono rimasta calma. Questo l’ha innervosita”. Diversa l’opinione di Khulud. Lei racconta di come si fosse preparata per affrontare quella che considerava come la passiva aggressività di Alia. Khulud era già stata sposata quando aveva 16 anni. Due anni dopo il marito volle divorziare perché non era riuscita a soddisfarlo. Da allora Khulud – cosa insolita in questa società – ha preso in mano la propria vita di donna sola aprendo un negozio di parrucchiere, pur continuando a vivere con i genitori. “Il lavoro mi ha aiutata a trattare con persone di ogni tipo: per questo sapevo che affrontare la prima moglie sarebbe stato facile. Alia all’inzio è stata aggressiva con me e l’ho lasciata fare: dopo tutto avevo invaso il suo territorio, e fingevo di ignorare le sue frecciatine. Credo che a rendermi attraente agli occhi di Wael sia stato il mio carattere forte e indipendente”. Alia contesta questa versione: “Prima di sottoscrivere il contratto matrimoniale, Wael l’aveva incontrata una sola volta, quindi non posso immaginare che ad attrarlo sia stato il suo carattere”. Ammette però che Khulud ha delle qualità che a lei mancano. E non c’è da sorprendersene: a differenza di Khulud, che si è sposata la seconda volta relativamente tardi, il matrimonio con Alia era stato combinato dalla sua famiglia quando lei aveva 14 anni e Wael 24. “Ero giovane, non sapevo nulla”, dice. “Khulud è stata in mezzo agli altri, ha sentito le loro storie, è più sicura di sé e, lo ammetto, è più veloce nelle faccende. Adesso capisco che mio marito non cercava una donna più bella, ma desiderava sentirsi meglio. Lo amo e accetto, ma non ritengo più di avere con mio marito un matrimonio completo. Quando va di sopra per passare la notte con Khulud bacio le sue calze”, confessa. Più tardi, Khulud rivela che quando si è sposata non sapeva che Wael avrebbe alternato le sue notti tra lei e Alia. “Non è facile nemmeno per me”, dice. Ma, aggiunge, spesso al pomeriggio Wael viene di sopra anche quando tocca ad Alia, “perché qui è più tranquillo”. Di giorno nella casa tutte le porte restano aperte, in modo che i bambini possano stare con il padre ovunque lui si trovi, e la famiglia mangia insieme. Di notte però le porte si chiudono, e i due piani diventano appartamenti separati. Per quanto tali compromessi possano apparire strani, quando in passato le donne laiche palestinesi scesero in piazza contro la poligamia, denunciata come “avvilente per le donne”, vennero accusate di ottusità proprio da coloro che, come Khulud e Alia, vivono una condizione simile. In Occidente gli uomini si fanno amanti: la poligamia, dicono, è più morale. Sebbene in privato le due donne mi confessino l’angoscia che viene loro da un matrimonio condiviso, quando sono in compagnia l’una dell’altra mi assicurano di andare d’accordo “come sorelle”. Durante i giorni e le notti trascorsi con loro, vedo con quale calma si ripartiscono i lavori domestici. Alia si dedica più alla cucina, Khulud al bucato. E mentre è Wael che va a fare la spesa, in sua assenza questo compito – oltre alle responsabilità economiche della famiglia – passa a Khulud, mentre Alia riceve solo una modesta somma di denaro. La vita di Alia appare molto più limitata di quella della seconda moglie. Quando, per esempio, lei dice ai cognati di voler visitare i propri genitori a Nablus, la richiesta viene subito respinta. Ma quando Khulud annuncia di andare al suo salone di parrucchiera che ha appena riaperto nessuno si oppone. Così, il giorno dopo accompagno Khulud al lavoro. Il viaggio è complicato, benché il villaggio di Qatanna sia visibile da Ar-Ram e un tempo per raggiungerlo bastavano dieci minuti. Adesso le cose sono cambiate, e lo stesso tragitto può richiedere ore a causa di quella che gli israeliani chiamano una “barriera di separazione anti-terrorismo”: un imponente muro di cemento con filo spinato elettrificato che attraversa la Cisgiordania, giudicato illegale dalla Corte internazionale di giustizia dell’Aia.  I nostri bus procedono a zigzag per evitare il muro, ed è chiaro quale piaga rappresenti per i palestinesi questa barriera che spacca le loro comunità, divide le famiglie e isola molte persone dal posto di lavoro. “Non so se potrò continuare a lungo a fare questo”, dice Khulud. “Qui molti hanno perso il lavoro che gli dava da vivere. Ci rendono la vita impossibile: non c’è da stupirsi se ci sono quelli che esplodono dalla rabbia”. Questa frustrazione sottolinea il profondo senso di sconforto che accompagna la vita dei palestinesi, e in particolare le donne che risentono pesantemente delle conseguenze del conflitto. Quando chiedo a Khulud e Alia quale futuro immaginano per i loro figli, dicono di sperare che studino, trovino un lavoro, abbiano una famiglia e una vita felice. “Ma che possibilità abbiamo che ciò accada?”, si domanda Khulud. “A volte, mentre cullo Hamzeh vorrei che fosse abbastanza grande da girare armato…”. Quando simili desideri sono trasmessi ai giovani, che possibilità può avere la pace? Come in ogni cultura, speranze e valori sono tramandanti con il latte materno.  È con questo pensiero che vado a incontrare Ni’mah, la madre di Wael, la donna che sembra prendere ogni decisione e la cui presenza incombe pesantemente sulla vita di Khulud e Alia. Mi bastano poche ore in sua compagnia per mettere a fuoco le dinamiche personali e politiche della famiglia. La casa sorge all’interno delle mura della madrassa diretta da Wael. Ni’mah siede in poltrona, mi scruta e prima di parlare strizza gli occhi per qualche istante. “Alia quando si è sposata era molto giovane. Pensavamo che sarebbe maturata: con il tempo una moglie dovrebbe imparare a soddisfare meglio le esigenze del proprio marito, ma questo non è accaduto. È solo in casi estremi che un uomo prende una seconda moglie, ed è passato molto tempo prima che ci trovassimo d’accordo con Wael sul fatto che fosse quella la soluzione giusta. Alia avrebbe dovuto essere più premurosa con il marito: un uomo richiede attenzione, e a Wael piace l’ordine, piace apparire elegante. Khulud è una lontana parente, qundi sul suo comportamento ho un certo controllo. Se un uomo prende una seconda moglie è la prima moglie a esserne responsabile. Se una persona non è capace di fare la moglie perfetta per mio figlio, dovrebbe stare attenta”, dice con fare minaccioso.  Dal modo in cui parla e da quanto Wael mi ha precedentemente spiegato, una moglie “perfetta” è quella che non solo è costantemente attenta al marito ma è anche capace di lavorare velocemente e amministrare la casa con frugalità.  “Amo molto i miei figli”, continua Ni’mah. Suo marito, un uomo magro che non ha mai preso una seconda moglie, siede al suo fianco in silenzio, appollaiato su una seggiola. “Li ho sempre incoraggiati a essere patriottici e religiosi”. E va avanti a raccontare di come nel 1948, quando i britannici si ritirarono dalla Palestina e venne fondato lo Stato di Israele, la sua famiglia fu cacciata dall’ampia tenuta vicino a Gerusalemme che le apparteneva da generazioni. “Per me la parola di Dio è più importante dei miei figli”, dichiara. “E Dio dice che dobbiamo dichiarare la jihad per riprenderci la nostra terra da coloro che ce l’hanno sottratta. E se Dio insiste che devo sacrificare i miei figli, lo farò”. La mattina dopo, quando mi congedo da Alia, Khulud e i loro figli, provo una maggiore comprensione per le difficoltà personali e poltiche che devono affrontare. Una rappresentante di Hamas al Parlamento, il cui marito dal carcere ha preso una seconda moglie, descrive le circostanze in termini analogamente infuocati. “La poligamia è come combattere una guerra”, sostiene. “Un soldato va in guerra per difendere il proprio Paese, ed è consapevole di poter morire, ma lo fa per una causa nobile, e Dio ci ordina di accettarlo. Accettando la poligamia io mi sento come un soldato che mette in atto la volontà di Dio, per quanto dura possa essere”.  Nella sua battaglia, la “causa nobile” è quello che lei definisce “il godimento di uomini e donne”. Ma non è difficile capire come siano gli uomini molto più che le donne, a godere i frutti di un conflitto così intimo. Mentre Wael langue in prigione, Alia e Khulud restano sole a domandarsi con chi di loro, una volta scarcerato, trascorrerà la prima notte. L’ultima volta che è uscito di prigione Wael si è trovato di fronte a un dilemmma analogo, e volendo trattare entrambe le mogli con equanimità ha cercato il consiglio di un leader religioso, il quale gli ha consigliato di tornare nel letto della moglie con cui si trovava la notte del suo arresto. Si trattava, in quel caso, di Khulud. Poiché anche questa volta Wael è stato arrestato poco dopo essersi coricato con Khulud, questa spera che lui torni a passare la prima notte con lei.  Coerente con la sua natura gentile, Alia si rassegna a una simile eventualità. “Voglio che torni a casa”, sospira. “Come si possono crescere dei bambini in queste condizioni, con un padre che gli viene sottratto di continuo? Non ci resta che riporre la nostra fede in Dio, e questo per noi significa Hamas”. ©The Sunday Times Magazine (Fotografie dell’ag. Sipa Press/F. Speranza